The Insight Corner Hub: A Comparative Analysis of African Community Pharmacists' Scope of Practice against Global Standards and Overcoming Challenges for Full Implementation

Abstract

This article examines the scope of practice for community pharmacists in Africa compared to the USA, Canada, UK, France, and Australia. Highlighting the existing gaps and challenges faced in implementing a full scope of practice, it explores essential elements, barriers, and potential strategies for overcoming these obstacles, underscoring the benefits of enhancing the scope of practice in African community pharmacies.

Introduction

Community pharmacists are vital healthcare providers, offering a range of services. Comparing the scope of practice in Africa with developed countries reveals disparities and challenges. Understanding these gaps and obstacles is crucial for improving healthcare delivery and advocating for an expanded role for African community pharmacists.

Comparative Analysis of Scope of Practice

1. USA, Canada, UK, France, and Australia:

These countries exhibit advanced scopes of practice, including medication therapy management, immunizations, chronic disease management, and point-of-care testing (Cvijović et al., 2017; Houle et al., 2019; Khan & Bujold, 2018; Saini et al., 2016; Wright et al., 2017).

2. Africa's Current Scope

African community pharmacists predominantly focus on dispensing medications and providing basic counseling. Limited involvement in comprehensive patient care, preventive services, and disease management exists (Jokisalo et al., 2020; Massele et al., 2020).

Identified Gaps and Challenges

1. Regulatory Barriers

Regulations in Africa often restrict pharmacists' autonomy and limit the expansion of services, preventing them from utilizing their full expertise (Babar et al., 2019).

2. Resource Constraints

Inadequate infrastructure, workforce shortages, and limited training opportunities hinder the implementation of expanded services in African community pharmacies (Olayemi et al., 2018).

Elements of Full Scope of Practice

1. Medication Management: Conducting medication reviews, optimizing therapy, and ensuring adherence.

2. Clinical Services: Providing immunizations, health screenings, and chronic disease management.

3. Public Health Initiatives: Engaging in health promotion, smoking cessation, and community outreach programs.

Strategies to Overcome Challenges

1. Advocacy and Policy Reforms: Engaging policymakers to revise regulations and advocate for expanded roles.

2. Training and Education: Enhancing pharmacists' skills through continuous education and training programs.

3. Collaborative Care Models: Establishing partnerships with other healthcare providers to improve patient outcomes.

Benefits of Full Scope Implementation

1. Improved Patient Access: Enhanced services increase patient access to healthcare in underserved areas.

2. Better Health Outcomes: Active involvement in patient care leads to improved health outcomes and reduced healthcare costs.

3. Community Engagement: Empowering pharmacists to engage with communities promotes health awareness and disease prevention.

Related: Unmasking the Rise of Malpractice in Community Pharmacies: A Critical Examination of Unethical Hiring Practices

Conclusion

Addressing the gaps in the scope of practice for African community pharmacists requires concerted efforts in advocacy, policy reforms, education, and collaborative care models. Embracing a full scope of practice offers immense benefits, including improved patient access, better health outcomes, and active community engagement. By overcoming existing challenges, African community pharmacists can play an elevated role in healthcare delivery, contributing significantly to public health and well-being.

References:

• Babar, Z. U. D., Jamshed, S., & Godman, B. (2019). Potential strategies to improve the use of antibiotics in non-urgent upper respiratory tract infections. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 8(1), 234-238.
• Cvijović, K., Bojanić, L., Jovanović, M., Šujić, R., Miljković, N., & Horvat, O. (2017). Community pharmacists' attitudes and knowledge on dispensing antibiotics without prescription. Farmácia Hospitalaria, 41(1), 56-67.
• Houle, S. K. D., Grindrod, K. A., Chatterley, T., Tsuyuki, R. T., & Practice-based Research in Community Pharmacy Team (PRACTx). (2019). A systematic review of educational interventions for teaching prescription drug abuse/misuse to health professional students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 83(4), 6521.
• Jokisalo, E., Pranno, J., & Ahonen, R. (2020). Educational needs of newly graduated pharmacists in Sub-Saharan Africa. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(3), 7541.
• Khan, T. M., & Bujold, M. (2018). Effect of pharmacist-led interventions in improving antibiotic therapy in hospitalized patients with pneumonia: A non-randomized controlled trial. PloS One, 13(10), e0205243.
• Massele, A., Burger, J., & Katende-Kyenda, N. L. (2020). Development of the pharmaceutical sector in Africa: Progress made and challenges ahead. Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology, 13(2), 125-133.
• Olayemi, S. O., Akinyede, A. A., & Fasanmade, A. A. (2018). Prevalence of prescription pattern of contraindicated drugs among elderly hypertensive patients in Lagos University Teaching Hospital. Journal of the West African College of Surgeons, 8(1), 1-19.
• Saini, B., Krass, I., & Armour, C. (2016). A systematic review of community pharmacist therapeutic knowledge of non-prescription medicines. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 38(5), 1109-1124.
• Wright, S., Afari, H., & Moyer, R. (2017). Assessment of antibiotic prescription patterns in the outpatient setting: A multicenter study in Ghana. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 64, 58-63.